microfluidics device (pdms drop-seq) Search Results


90
FlowJEM Inc customed microfluidic devices
Customed Microfluidic Devices, supplied by FlowJEM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/customed microfluidic devices/product/FlowJEM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
customed microfluidic devices - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FlowJEM Inc drop-seq specific microfluidics device
Drop Seq Specific Microfluidics Device, supplied by FlowJEM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/drop-seq specific microfluidics device/product/FlowJEM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drop-seq specific microfluidics device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FlowJEM Inc aquapel-treated drop-seq microfluidic device
Aquapel Treated Drop Seq Microfluidic Device, supplied by FlowJEM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aquapel-treated drop-seq microfluidic device/product/FlowJEM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aquapel-treated drop-seq microfluidic device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MicroFluidic Systems high throughput microfluidic systems 10x chromium
Transcriptomic profiling of human and embryonic tissues, experimental animal models and patient-derived cell lines via scRNA-seq enables the study of pancreas progenitors. (1) Single-cell suspensions enter high throughput microfluidic systems (e.g. <t>10X</t> Chromium, Drop-Seq) allowing thousands of cells to be processed and sequenced. (2) Cells undergo dimensionality reduction and are clustered based upon expression profiles – represented via UMAP or t-SNE - enabling the identification of novel cell types and investigation of cellular heterogeneity. (3) Following clustering, differential expression analysis reveals changes in gene expression across cell types. (4) Prediction of cell trajectories can be inferred based upon changes in gene expression over a ‘pseudo’ time-course. Cells are ordered in a 2D space based upon the closeness of their expression pro_les. Overlay of a minimal spanning tree (MST) identifies the longest continual path linking these cells – uncovering cell lineages. (5) Individual trajectories can be dissected and changes in specific gene expression changes plotted in both a supervised and unsupervised manner (6) The development of algorithms (e.g. StemID, SCENT) has enabled the prediction of cell clusters with high potency, stem-like features. Used in conjunction with pseudotime analysis, these algorithms can infer a starting point of differentiation trajectories, as well as identifying novel stem cells in adult tissues.
High Throughput Microfluidic Systems 10x Chromium, supplied by MicroFluidic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/high throughput microfluidic systems 10x chromium/product/MicroFluidic Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
high throughput microfluidic systems 10x chromium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics microfluidic droplet-based platform 10x genomics chromium
A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including <t>microfluidic</t> (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.
Microfluidic Droplet Based Platform 10x Genomics Chromium, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microfluidic droplet-based platform 10x genomics chromium/product/10X Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microfluidic droplet-based platform 10x genomics chromium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MicroFluidic Systems indrop
A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including <t>microfluidic</t> (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.
Indrop, supplied by MicroFluidic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/indrop/product/MicroFluidic Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
indrop - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MicroFluidic Systems microfluidic systems drop-seq
A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including <t>microfluidic</t> (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.
Microfluidic Systems Drop Seq, supplied by MicroFluidic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microfluidic systems drop-seq/product/MicroFluidic Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microfluidic systems drop-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics drop seq
A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including <t>microfluidic</t> (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.
Drop Seq, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/drop seq/product/10X Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drop seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MicroFluidic Systems drop-seq
A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including <t>microfluidic</t> (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.
Drop Seq, supplied by MicroFluidic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/drop-seq/product/MicroFluidic Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drop-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc drop-seq microfluidic
Summary of recent findings of scRNA-seq in Ovarian cancer.
Drop Seq Microfluidic, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/drop-seq microfluidic/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drop-seq microfluidic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FlowJEM Inc pdms co-flow microfluidic droplet generation device
Summary of recent findings of scRNA-seq in Ovarian cancer.
Pdms Co Flow Microfluidic Droplet Generation Device, supplied by FlowJEM Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pdms co-flow microfluidic droplet generation device/product/FlowJEM Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pdms co-flow microfluidic droplet generation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
fluidigm microfluidic approach fluidigm c1
Summary of recent findings of scRNA-seq in Ovarian cancer.
Microfluidic Approach Fluidigm C1, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microfluidic approach fluidigm c1/product/fluidigm
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microfluidic approach fluidigm c1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Transcriptomic profiling of human and embryonic tissues, experimental animal models and patient-derived cell lines via scRNA-seq enables the study of pancreas progenitors. (1) Single-cell suspensions enter high throughput microfluidic systems (e.g. 10X Chromium, Drop-Seq) allowing thousands of cells to be processed and sequenced. (2) Cells undergo dimensionality reduction and are clustered based upon expression profiles – represented via UMAP or t-SNE - enabling the identification of novel cell types and investigation of cellular heterogeneity. (3) Following clustering, differential expression analysis reveals changes in gene expression across cell types. (4) Prediction of cell trajectories can be inferred based upon changes in gene expression over a ‘pseudo’ time-course. Cells are ordered in a 2D space based upon the closeness of their expression pro_les. Overlay of a minimal spanning tree (MST) identifies the longest continual path linking these cells – uncovering cell lineages. (5) Individual trajectories can be dissected and changes in specific gene expression changes plotted in both a supervised and unsupervised manner (6) The development of algorithms (e.g. StemID, SCENT) has enabled the prediction of cell clusters with high potency, stem-like features. Used in conjunction with pseudotime analysis, these algorithms can infer a starting point of differentiation trajectories, as well as identifying novel stem cells in adult tissues.

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology

Article Title: Stem/progenitor cells in normal physiology and disease of the pancreas

doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111459

Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptomic profiling of human and embryonic tissues, experimental animal models and patient-derived cell lines via scRNA-seq enables the study of pancreas progenitors. (1) Single-cell suspensions enter high throughput microfluidic systems (e.g. 10X Chromium, Drop-Seq) allowing thousands of cells to be processed and sequenced. (2) Cells undergo dimensionality reduction and are clustered based upon expression profiles – represented via UMAP or t-SNE - enabling the identification of novel cell types and investigation of cellular heterogeneity. (3) Following clustering, differential expression analysis reveals changes in gene expression across cell types. (4) Prediction of cell trajectories can be inferred based upon changes in gene expression over a ‘pseudo’ time-course. Cells are ordered in a 2D space based upon the closeness of their expression pro_les. Overlay of a minimal spanning tree (MST) identifies the longest continual path linking these cells – uncovering cell lineages. (5) Individual trajectories can be dissected and changes in specific gene expression changes plotted in both a supervised and unsupervised manner (6) The development of algorithms (e.g. StemID, SCENT) has enabled the prediction of cell clusters with high potency, stem-like features. Used in conjunction with pseudotime analysis, these algorithms can infer a starting point of differentiation trajectories, as well as identifying novel stem cells in adult tissues.

Article Snippet: Transcriptomic profiling of human and embryonic tissues, experimental animal models and patient-derived cell lines via scRNA-seq enables the study of pancreas progenitors. (1) Single-cell suspensions enter high throughput microfluidic systems (e.g. 10X Chromium, Drop-Seq) allowing thousands of cells to be processed and sequenced. (2) Cells undergo dimensionality reduction and are clustered based upon expression profiles – represented via UMAP or t-SNE - enabling the identification of novel cell types and investigation of cellular heterogeneity. (3) Following clustering, differential expression analysis reveals changes in gene expression across cell types. (4) Prediction of cell trajectories can be inferred based upon changes in gene expression over a ‘pseudo’ time-course.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, High Throughput Screening Assay, Expressing

A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including microfluidic (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Single-Cell Data Integration and Cell Type Annotation through Contrastive Adversarial Open-set Domain Adaptation

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.04.616599

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Comparison of SAFAARI’s performance with the selected reference-based cell-type annotation models in both open-set and closed-set settings. The scRNA-seq data from eight different tissues in the Tabula Muris cell atlas was obtained where the gene counts were derived using two techniques: 10x Genomics and FACS-based cell capture in plates (FACS). For the performance assessment, either FACS or 10x was considered as the source dataset, and the other as the target dataset, to evaluate reference-based cell type annotation or label transfer in the presence of a technology-based domain-shift or batch effect. Two scenarios were considered: the closed-set, where only cell types common to both source and target datasets were included, and the open-set, where the target dataset contained an unknown cell type not present in the source dataset . B) Heatmap representing the confusion matrix across eight tissues (target: FACS), showing cell-type-specific annotation performance. Columns represent the actual cell labels, while rows show the predicted cell labels. The cell type coloured in navy blue represents the unknown cell type whose instances were removed from the source dataset. Colours in the viridis palette and indicate the proportion of cells relative to the sum of the column (i.e., values across columns should add up to 1.0). This represents the proportion of correct classifications (diagonal values) and misclassifications for each particular cell type represented by the column names. C) UMAP of open-set Label transfer result of SAFAARI on four human pancreas datasets generated with different technologies, including microfluidic (Fluidigm C), droplet-based (InDrops) and plate-based scRNA-seq (CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2) as detailed in . It demonstrates SAFAARI’s superior batch mixing, cell separation and unknown cell type detection.

Article Snippet: These methods range from microfluidic droplet-based platforms (such as 10x Genomics Chromium, Drop-seq, and inDrops) to plate-based scRNA-seq technologies like Smart-seq, Smart-seq2, and Smart-seq3, resulting in substantial heterogeneity across datasets.

Techniques: Comparison, Derivative Assay, Generated

Summary of recent findings of scRNA-seq in Ovarian cancer.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Unlocking ovarian cancer heterogeneity: advancing immunotherapy through single-cell transcriptomics

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388663

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of recent findings of scRNA-seq in Ovarian cancer.

Article Snippet: , Metastatic HGSOC/malignant tumor biopsy , N=6 9,885 single cells from omental tumor samples of 6 patients , Pre-chemotherapy = 2/6 Post-chemotherapy = 4/6 , 1. Identification of unique sub-populations of CD274 + and IRF8 + macrophages, CD4 + GNLY + T cells, plasmablasts and plasma B cells. 2. Transcriptional analysis of immune cells stratifies our patient samples into 2 groups: (1) high T cell infiltration and (2) low T cell infiltration. 3. Plasmablast and plasma B cell clusters, and NR1H2 + IRF8 + and CD274 + macrophage clusters, suggesting an anti-tumor response in the high Tinf group. , Drop-seq microfluidic, Illumina’s NextSeq 500 , ( ) .

Techniques: Phospho-proteomics, Activity Assay, Gene Expression, Marker, Multiplex Assay, Clinical Proteomics, RNA Sequencing, Sequencing, Activation Assay, Expressing, Migration, Functional Assay